How should participatory editing work?
May 11th, 2008As our New Orleans VideoVoice Project enters the post-production phase, we are discovering that there are countless ways to coordinate editing. When we first set up our program plan, Anthony and I proposed that the community participants might play a kind of director role. They would select footage, collaboratively develop the storyline, identify key characters and their traits, and then give many rounds of feedback on rough versions of the final film. Although this path might have some benefits, particularly in the way of saving post-production time, there are some real draw backs. Michele Otis, a videographer and community leader in the New Orleans VideoVoice Project wrote this very thorough argument on the importance of building community capacity to use editing software and, ultimately, to edit films independently of professional outside editors.
Hello All,
My name is Michele Burton-Oatis. I am a participant in the Video Voice Collective in New Orleans. The reason I’m sending you all this e-mail, is to address my concerns about the editing process of the documentary. It is my understanding, that the editing will primarily take place outside of New Orleans. And that we the participants are to identify parts of the films that we have shot and state what we would like to see. At that point, Anthony will then take our selections, edit them together and then submit the film’s rough edit for our approval. If my assessment of the editing component of the project is correct, I must express my concerns. The best way for me to do this is to use what I have read from your web site.
“Train them to produce their own media around health and resilience issues that are important to them and their neighborhoods in which they live.”
If this quote is true, then editing is a major component in the process. Each participant has taken the time to go out into the community and shoot things that were important and sometimes very dear to them. This gives you the VIDEO. The editing is how we will express our VOICES. By not fully investing the time to teach us the techniques as stated in your proposal and allowing this film to truly reflect what we have learned would be an insult to our commitment.
“Forming a partnership among these disparate groups is a community-building process that results in collective envisioning, filming, editing, and dissemination of films.”
If this is no longer a goal in this project, are we not just test subjects. If that is the case, than I see little that makes this project and the film any different than the others of New Orleans.
“Freire argued that every individual, no matter how “ignorant” or consumed in the “culture of silence”, is capable of looking critically at the world through collective dialogue with others.”
This statement is very powerful. I truly thank all of you for this project. Because of my involvement, I view the rebirth of my city very differently. I am invested in this project and my community. That is why I along with any other participant who desires, deserves to have every opportunity to gain the knowledge and hands on experience to complete what we have set out to accomplish.
I ask you to consider the most important part of this project if you all are truly interested in hearing our voices.
Sincerely,
Mrs. Michele J. Burton-Oatis
